↓ Skip to main content

Superluminous supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Superluminous supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey
Published in
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, May 2019
DOI 10.1093/mnras/stz1321
Authors

C R Angus, M Smith, M Sullivan, C Inserra, P Wiseman, C B D’Andrea, B P Thomas, R C Nichol, L Galbany, M Childress, J Asorey, P J Brown, R Casas, F J Castander, C Curtin, C Frohmaier, K Glazebrook, D Gruen, C Gutierrez, R Kessler, A G Kim, C Lidman, E Macaulay, P Nugent, M Pursiainen, M Sako, M Soares-Santos, R C Thomas, T M C Abbott, S Avila, E Bertin, D Brooks, E Buckley-Geer, D L Burke, A Carnero Rosell, J Carretero, L N da Costa, J De Vicente, S Desai, H T Diehl, P Doel, T F Eifler, B Flaugher, P Fosalba, J Frieman, J García-Bellido, R A Gruendl, J Gschwend, W G Hartley, D L Hollowood, K Honscheid, B Hoyle, D J James, K Kuehn, N Kuropatkin, O Lahav, M Lima, M A G Maia, M March, J L Marshall, F Menanteau, C J Miller, R Miquel, R L C Ogando, A A Plazas, A K Romer, E Sanchez, R Schindler, M Schubnell, F Sobreira, E Suchyta, M E C Swanson, G Tarle, D Thomas, D L Tucker,

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 35%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 16 70%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,357,045
of 28,752,327 outputs
Outputs from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#13,656
of 41,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,313
of 370,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#392
of 760 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,752,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 760 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.