↓ Skip to main content

TBP, Mot1, and NC2 establish a regulatory circuit that controls DPE-dependent versus TATA-dependent transcription

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Development, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
TBP, Mot1, and NC2 establish a regulatory circuit that controls DPE-dependent versus TATA-dependent transcription
Published in
Genes & Development, August 2008
DOI 10.1101/gad.1681808
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The RNA polymerase II core promoter is a structurally and functionally diverse transcriptional module. RNAi depletion and overexpression experiments revealed a genetic circuit that controls the balance of transcription from two core promoter motifs, the TATA box and the downstream core promoter element (DPE). In this circuit, TBP activates TATA-dependent transcription and represses DPE-dependent transcription, whereas Mot1 and NC2 block TBP function and thus repress TATA-dependent transcription and activate DPE-dependent transcription. This regulatory circuit is likely to be one means by which biological networks can transmit transcriptional signals, such as those from DPE-specific and TATA-specific enhancers, via distinct pathways.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Russia 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 79 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 24%
Researcher 20 24%
Student > Master 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Professor 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Neuroscience 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2008.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Development
#5,072
of 5,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,082
of 82,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Development
#47
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.