Employee health and infection control.

Overview of attention for article published in Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), January 2015

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy: 2 policy sources

guideline: 3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley: 2 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Employee health and infection control.
Published in	Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), January 2015
DOI	10.1086/647110
Pubmed ID	7657978
Authors	Daniel J. Diekema, Bradley N. Doebbeling

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2023.

All research outputs

#3,024,372

of 34,364,397 outputs

Outputs from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)

#987

of 6,159 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#33,859

of 409,376 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)

#251

of 2,014 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 6,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 2,014 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.