↓ Skip to main content

Break-induced replication requires all essential DNA replication factors except those specific for pre-RC assembly

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Development, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Break-induced replication requires all essential DNA replication factors except those specific for pre-RC assembly
Published in
Genes & Development, June 2010
DOI 10.1101/gad.1922610
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Break-induced replication (BIR) is an efficient homologous recombination (HR) pathway employed to repair a DNA double-strand break (DSB) when homology is restricted to one end. All three major replicative DNA polymerases are required for BIR, including the otherwise nonessential Pol32 subunit. Here we show that BIR requires the replicative DNA helicase (Cdc45, the GINS, and Mcm2-7 proteins) as well as Cdt1. In contrast, both subunits of origin recognition complex (ORC) and Cdc6, which are required to create a prereplication complex (pre-RC), are dispensable. The Cdc7 kinase, required for both initiation of DNA replication and post-replication repair (PRR), is also required for BIR. Ubiquitination and sumoylation of the DNA processivity clamp PCNA play modest roles; in contrast, PCNA alleles that suppress pol32Delta's cold sensitivity fail to suppress its role in BIR, and are by themselves dominant inhibitors of BIR. These results suggest that origin-independent BIR involves cross-talk between normal DNA replication factors and PRR.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Greece 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 211 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 29%
Researcher 48 22%
Student > Master 22 10%
Professor 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 29 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 <1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 28 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2010.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Development
#5,072
of 5,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,688
of 95,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Development
#29
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.