↓ Skip to main content

Reconstitution of initial steps of dsDNA break repair by the RecF pathway of E. coli

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Development, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reconstitution of initial steps of dsDNA break repair by the RecF pathway of E. coli
Published in
Genes & Development, May 2009
DOI 10.1101/gad.1780709
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The RecF pathway of Escherichia coli is important for recombinational repair of DNA breaks and gaps. Here ;we reconstitute in vitro a seven-protein reaction that recapitulates early steps of dsDNA break repair using purified RecA, RecF, RecO, RecR, RecQ, RecJ, and SSB proteins, components of the RecF system. Their combined action results in processing of linear dsDNA and its homologous pairing with supercoiled DNA. RecA, RecO, RecR, and RecJ are essential for joint molecule formation, whereas SSB and RecF are stimulatory. This reconstituted system reveals an unexpected essential function for RecJ exonuclease: the capability to resect duplex DNA. RecQ helicase stimulates this processing, but also disrupts joint molecules. RecO and RecR have two indispensable functions: They mediate exchange of RecA for SSB to form the RecA nucleoprotein filament, and act with RecF to load RecA onto the SSB-ssDNA complex at processed ssDNA-dsDNA junctions. The RecF pathway has many parallels with recombinational repair in eukaryotes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 139 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 25%
Researcher 38 25%
Student > Master 15 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 29 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Development
#2,690
of 5,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,868
of 92,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Development
#16
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.