Wide-area transepithelial sampling with computer-assisted 3-dimensional analysis (WATS) markedly improves detection of esophageal dysplasia and Barrett's esophagus: analysis from a prospective multicenter community-based study
M S Smith, E Ikonomi, R Bhuta, N Iorio, R D Kataria, V Kaul, S A Gross, J J Hong, T W Eastman, T J Harpole, J Kao, R G Lim, S Seela, S Ramesh, H Sheela, W D McLaughlin, T J Rutland, S J Tarwater, D F Jackson, J J Crittenden, R P Albares, K R Feuer, R A Dumois, T T Tran, G Reiss, J J Santoro, B P Kaufman, J L Spaar, G A Rosman, J S Hixon, D A Beary, P A Hellstern, S Chandrupatla, S Mathur, R W McCullough, M K Taormina, S G Abshire, J F Noel, V Dugan, P S Lee, S C Block, T D Miller, M A Jabor, K P Kensing, B S Fenton, U M Ganga, T L Phipps, C J Murray, F G Rabito, L P Jenkins, H B Hamat, R Chalasani, G T Reddy, D R Thurman, P P Berookim, A Awan, P A Masters, M Garza, A Pruitt, S De Melo, D L Chumley, Z Singson, S K Dwivedi, A Espinoza, V Yu, T Shinde
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#622,586
of 28,947,901 outputs
Outputs from Diseases of the Esophagus
#7
of 1,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,318
of 455,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diseases of the Esophagus
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,947,901 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
