↓ Skip to main content

Female Recreational Exercisers at Risk for Low Energy Availability.

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Sport Nutrition, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Female Recreational Exercisers at Risk for Low Energy Availability.
Published in
International Journal of Sport Nutrition, August 2016
DOI 10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0245
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Low energy availability (LEA) describes the disruption in normal physiological function existent when insufficient energy intake is combined with exercise. To conserve energy a range of endocrine adaptations occur, impairing health and athletic performance. The prevalence of LEA has not been fully established especially among recreational exercisers. Determining recreational exercisers at risk of LEA may help to maximise prevention, early diagnosis and treatment. The dasign of this study was across-sectional online survey. One-hundred and nine female recreational exercisers, with a mean age of 23.8 (SD 6.9) years were recruited via gyms and fitness centres throughout NZ. Participants completed an online questionnaire including questions from the LEAF (Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire). A total of 45.0% (CI, 35.4%, 54.8%) of participants were classified as at risk of LEA. For every extra hour of exercise per week the odds of being at risk of LEA were 1.13 times greater (CI 1.02, 1.25, p=0.016). All participants reporting previous stress fracture injuries (n=4) were classified as at risk of LEA. Significantly more subjects participating in an individual sport were classified as at risk of LEA (69.6%, CI 24.3%, 54.8%) compared to team sports (34.8%, CI 18.7%, 40.5%) (p= 0.006). The high prevalence of female recreational exercisers at risk of LEA is of concern, emphasising the importance of increasing awareness of the issue, and promoting prevention and early detection strategies, so treatment can be implemented before health is severely compromised.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 177 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Lecturer 10 6%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 72 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 42 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 73 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2026.
All research outputs
#1,875,157
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Sport Nutrition
#288
of 1,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,023
of 342,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Sport Nutrition
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.