↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Guideline Discordance With Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Best Practices for Common Urologic Procedures

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
43 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessment of Guideline Discordance With Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Best Practices for Common Urologic Procedures
Published in
JAMA Network Open, December 2018
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 30 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 31 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#430,840
of 28,086,468 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#2,882
of 12,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,534
of 450,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#50
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,086,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.