↓ Skip to main content

Heterotypic Gap Junctions between Two Neurons in the Drosophila Brain Are Critical for Memory

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Heterotypic Gap Junctions between Two Neurons in the Drosophila Brain Are Critical for Memory
Published in
Current Biology, April 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.041
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Gap junctions play an important role in the regulation of neuronal metabolism and homeostasis by serving as connections that enable small molecules to pass between cells and synchronize activity between cells. Although recent studies have linked gap junctions to memory formation, it remains unclear how they contribute to this process. Gap junctions are hexameric hemichannels formed from the connexin and pannexin gene families in chordates and the innexin (inx) gene family in invertebrates. Here we show that two modulatory neurons, the anterior paired lateral (APL) neuron and the dorsal paired medial (DPM) neuron, form heterotypic gap junctions within the mushroom body (MB), a learning and memory center in the Drosophila brain. Using RNA interference-mediated knockdowns of inx7 and inx6 in the APL and DPM neurons, respectively, we found that flies showed normal olfactory associative learning and intact anesthesia-resistant memory (ARM) but failed to form anesthesia-sensitive memory (ASM). Our results reveal that the heterotypic gap junctions between the APL and DPM neurons are an essential part of the MB circuitry for memory formation, potentially constituting a recurrent neural network to stabilize ASM.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Germany 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
China 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 216 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 26%
Researcher 61 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Student > Master 13 5%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 39 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 108 45%
Neuroscience 54 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 39 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2025.
All research outputs
#8,406,085
of 28,368,070 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#9,501
of 15,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,007
of 130,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#38
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,368,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.