↓ Skip to main content

B-Cell Clones as Early Markers for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
B-Cell Clones as Early Markers for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2009
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa0806122
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Otherwise healthy persons with a small number of B-cell clones circulating in the peripheral blood have been designated as having monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL). Hospital-based series indicate an excess risk of progression from MBL to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this prospective cohort study, we tested the hypothesis that CLL is always preceded by MBL.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 183 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Other 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 54 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 61 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,678,617
of 34,709,857 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#21,229
of 38,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,920
of 259,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#102
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,709,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.