↓ Skip to main content

Both Bias and Lack of Knowledge Influence Organizational Focus on First Case of the Day Starts

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Both Bias and Lack of Knowledge Influence Organizational Focus on First Case of the Day Starts
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2009
DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819a6dd4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The economic costs of reducing first case delays are often high, because efforts need to be applied to multiple operating rooms (ORs) simultaneously. Nevertheless, delays in starting first cases of the day are a common topic in OR committee meetings.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Brazil 2 3%
Rwanda 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 58 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Librarian 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 20 29%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 45%
Engineering 6 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2009.
All research outputs
#24,754,523
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#8,829
of 10,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,661
of 150,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#85
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.