↓ Skip to main content

Significant differences in patients with a complete insufficiency of the great versus small saphenous vein

Overview of attention for article published in Phlebology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Significant differences in patients with a complete insufficiency of the great versus small saphenous vein
Published in
Phlebology, December 2018
DOI 10.1177/0268355518798277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2026.
All research outputs
#10,631,389
of 34,190,942 outputs
Outputs from Phlebology
#320
of 965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,677
of 486,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phlebology
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,190,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 965 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.