You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Traditionally managed landscapes do not prevent amphibian decline and the extinction of paedomorphosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecological Monographs, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/ecm.1347 |
Authors |
Mathieu Denoël, G. Francesco Ficetola, Neftali Sillero, Georg Džukić, Miloš L. Kalezić, Tanja Vukov, Irma Muhovic, Vuk Ikovic, Benjamin Lejeune |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 18% |
France | 1 | 9% |
Belgium | 1 | 9% |
Portugal | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 21% |
Student > Master | 12 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 18 | 32% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,553,872
of 23,733,540 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#128
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,527
of 440,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,733,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.