↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Indigenous health worker support for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of the Mana Tū programme
Published in
BMJ Open, December 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019572
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Master 15 9%
Researcher 12 7%
Other 8 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 4%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 88 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 13%
Psychology 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 91 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,160,628
of 26,382,058 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#13,215
of 26,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,667
of 449,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#252
of 485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,382,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.