↓ Skip to main content

A cautionary note on tests of overidentifying restrictions

Overview of attention for article published in Economics Letters, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A cautionary note on tests of overidentifying restrictions
Published in
Economics Letters, May 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.047
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 114 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 30%
Researcher 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 10%
Professor 9 8%
Other 6 5%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 56 49%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 11%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Mathematics 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2024.
All research outputs
#3,657,983
of 34,444,361 outputs
Outputs from Economics Letters
#480
of 3,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,195
of 212,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economics Letters
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,444,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.