↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the size of the human interactome

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
749 Mendeley
citeulike
33 CiteULike
connotea
7 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Estimating the size of the human interactome
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2008
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0708078105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael P. H. Stumpf, Thomas Thorne, Eric de Silva, Ronald Stewart, Hyeong Jun An, Michael Lappe, Carsten Wiuf

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 749 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 14 2%
United Kingdom 13 2%
Germany 6 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 692 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 215 29%
Researcher 125 17%
Student > Master 72 10%
Student > Bachelor 68 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 40 5%
Other 95 13%
Unknown 134 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 205 27%
Chemistry 126 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 125 17%
Computer Science 46 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 3%
Other 76 10%
Unknown 150 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2026.
All research outputs
#1,531,899
of 34,427,821 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#20,509
of 119,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,251
of 124,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#40
of 499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,427,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.