↓ Skip to main content

THO/Sub2p Functions to Coordinate 3′-End Processing with Gene-Nuclear Pore Association

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
THO/Sub2p Functions to Coordinate 3′-End Processing with Gene-Nuclear Pore Association
Published in
Cell, October 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

During transcription, proteins assemble sequentially with nascent RNA to generate a messenger ribonucleoprotein particle (mRNP). The THO complex and its associated Sub2p helicase are functionally implicated in both transcription and mRNP biogenesis but their precise function remains elusive. We show here that THO/Sub2p mutation leads to the accumulation of a stalled intermediate in mRNP biogenesis that contains nuclear pore components and polyadenylation factors in association with chromatin. Microarray analyses of genomic loci that are aberrantly docked to the nuclear pore in mutants allowed the identification of approximately 400 novel validated target genes that require THO /Sub2p for efficient expression. Our data strongly suggests that the THO complex/Sub2p function is required to coordinate events leading to the acquisition of export competence at a step that follows commitment to 3'-processing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
Denmark 2 1%
Russia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 139 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 24%
Student > Master 16 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 19 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2009.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#16,207
of 17,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,879
of 101,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#88
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.