↓ Skip to main content

The cerebral cavernous malformation signaling pathway promotes vascular integrity via Rho GTPases

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
14 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The cerebral cavernous malformation signaling pathway promotes vascular integrity via Rho GTPases
Published in
Nature Medicine, January 2009
DOI 10.1038/nm.1911
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) is a common vascular dysplasia that affects both systemic and central nervous system blood vessels. Loss of function mutations in the CCM2 gene cause CCM. Here we show that targeted disruption of Ccm2 in mice results in failed lumen formation and early embryonic death through an endothelial cell autonomous mechanism. We show that CCM2 regulates endothelial cytoskeletal architecture, cell-to-cell interactions and lumen formation. Heterozygosity at Ccm2, a genotype equivalent to that in human CCM, results in impaired endothelial barrier function. On the basis of our biochemical studies indicating that loss of CCM2 results in activation of RHOA GTPase, we rescued the cellular phenotype and barrier function in heterozygous mice with simvastatin, a drug known to inhibit Rho GTPases. These data offer the prospect for pharmacological treatment of a human vascular dysplasia with a widely available and safe drug.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 138 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 24%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Engineering 7 5%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2026.
All research outputs
#3,188,376
of 30,598,342 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#5,218
of 10,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,452
of 217,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#10
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,598,342 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 111.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.