↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does Water Relay Play an Important Role in Phosphoryl Transfer Reactions? Insights from Theoretical Study of a Model Reaction in Water and tert-Butanol
Published in
Journal of Physical Chemistry B, March 2009
DOI 10.1021/jp810755p
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To investigate whether water relay plays an important role in phosphoryl transfer reactions, we have used several theoretical approaches to compare key properties of uridine 3'-m-nitrobenzyl phosphate (UNP) in aqueous and tert-butanol solutions. Previous kinetic experiments found that the isomerization reaction of UNP is abolished in tert-butanol, which was interpreted as the direct evidence that supports the role of water relay in phosphoryl transfer. We have analyzed solute flexibility and solvent structure near the solute using equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations and a combined quantum mechanical/molecular mechanism (QM/MM) potential function for the solute. Snapshots from the simulations are then used in minimum energy path calculations to compare the energetics of direct nucleophilic attack and water-mediated nucleophilic attack pathways. QM/MM simulations are also used to compare the pseudorotation barriers for the pentavalent intermediate formed following the nucleophilic attack, another key step for the isomerization reaction. Combined results from these calculations suggest that water relay does not offer any significant energetic advantage over the direct nucleophilic attack. Unfortunately, the lack of isomerization in tert-butanol solution cannot be straightforwardly explained based on the results we have obtained here and therefore requires additional analysis. This study, nevertheless, has provided new insights into several most commonly discussed possibilities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 60%
Physics and Astronomy 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2009.
All research outputs
#24,940,335
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#11,623
of 17,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,206
of 164,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#94
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,760 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.