↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in Two Independent Pathways Are Sufficient to Create Hermaphroditic Nematodes

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mutations in Two Independent Pathways Are Sufficient to Create Hermaphroditic Nematodes
Published in
Science, November 2009
DOI 10.1126/science.1176013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans produces self-fertile hermaphrodites, it descended from a male/female species, so hermaphroditism provides a model for the origin of novel traits. In the related species C. remanei, which has only male and female sexes, lowering the activity of tra-2 by RNA interference created XX animals that made spermatids as well as oocytes, but their spermatids could not activate without the addition of male seminal fluid. However, by lowering the expression of both tra-2 and swm-1, a gene that regulates sperm activation in C. elegans, we produced XX animals with active sperm that were self-fertile. Thus, the evolution of hermaphroditism in Caenorhabditis probably required two steps: a mutation in the sex-determination pathway that caused XX spermatogenesis and a mutation that allowed these spermatids to self-activate.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 111 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 27%
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 15 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#21,994,332
of 34,333,622 outputs
Outputs from Science
#76,831
of 93,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,796
of 149,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#358
of 385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,333,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.