↓ Skip to main content

Paternal Dominance of Trans-eQTL Influences Gene Expression Patterns in Maize Hybrids

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Paternal Dominance of Trans-eQTL Influences Gene Expression Patterns in Maize Hybrids
Published in
Science, November 2009
DOI 10.1126/science.1178294
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Heterosis refers to the superior performance of hybrid progeny relative to their inbred parents, but the mechanisms responsible are unknown. Hybrids between the maize inbred lines B73 and Mo17 exhibit heterosis regardless of cross direction. These reciprocal hybrids differ from each other phenotypically, and 30 to 50% of their genes are differentially expressed. We identified approximately 4000 expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) that allowed us to identify markers linked to variation in expression. We found that over three-quarters of these eQTL act in trans (78%) and that 86% of these differentially regulate transcript accumulation in a manner consistent with gene expression in the hybrid being regulated exclusively by the paternally transmitted allele. This result suggests that widespread imprinting contributes to the regulation of gene expression in maize hybrids.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 3 1%
China 3 1%
Mexico 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 235 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 24%
Professor 19 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 7%
Student > Master 15 6%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 32 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 178 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 39 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,666,890
of 27,480,433 outputs
Outputs from Science
#71,083
of 85,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,406
of 192,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#322
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,480,433 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.