↓ Skip to main content

Sarcolemmal ATP-Sensitive K+ Channels Control Energy Expenditure Determining Body Weight

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sarcolemmal ATP-Sensitive K+ Channels Control Energy Expenditure Determining Body Weight
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), January 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.11.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Metabolic processes that regulate muscle energy use are major determinants of bodily energy balance. Here, we find that sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive K(+) (K(ATP)) channels, which couple membrane excitability with cellular metabolic pathways, set muscle energy expenditure under physiological stimuli. Disruption of K(ATP) channel function provoked, under conditions of unaltered locomotor activity and blood substrate availability, an extra energy cost of cardiac and skeletal muscle performance. Inefficient fuel metabolism in K(ATP) channel-deficient striated muscles reduced glycogen and fat body depots, promoting a lean phenotype. The propensity to lesser body weight imposed by K(ATP) channel deficit persisted under a high-fat diet, yet obesity restriction was achieved at the cost of compromised physical endurance. Thus, sarcolemmal K(ATP) channels govern muscle energy economy, and their downregulation in a tissue-specific manner could present an antiobesity strategy by rendering muscle increasingly thermogenic at rest and less fuel efficient during exercise.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Japan 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 12 15%
Professor 9 12%
Lecturer 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2010.
All research outputs
#6,136,775
of 34,517,649 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#2,567
of 3,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,634
of 235,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,649 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.