↓ Skip to main content

Bio‐physical models of marine environments reveal biases in the representation of protected areas

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Conservation, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bio‐physical models of marine environments reveal biases in the representation of protected areas
Published in
Aquatic Conservation, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/aqc.3003
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 18 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Computer Science 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#21,788,128
of 34,547,233 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Conservation
#1,466
of 2,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,221
of 489,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Conservation
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,547,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 489,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.