↓ Skip to main content

Membrane Anchoring Subunits Specify Selective Regulation of RGS9·Gβ5 GAP Complex in Photoreceptor Neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Membrane Anchoring Subunits Specify Selective Regulation of RGS9·Gβ5 GAP Complex in Photoreceptor Neurons
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, October 2010
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.1191-10.2010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The RGS9·Gβ5 complex is the key regulator of neuronal G-protein signaling and shows remarkable selectivity of subunit composition. In retinal photoreceptors, RGS9·Gβ5 is bound to the membrane anchor R9AP and the complex regulates visual signaling. In the basal ganglia neurons, RGS9·Gβ5 is instead associated with a homologous protein, R7BP, and regulates reward circuit. Switching this selective subunit composition of the complex in rod photoreceptors allowed us to study the molecular underpinning of signaling specificity in diverse G-protein pathways. We have found that both membrane anchoring subunits play a conserved role in regulating protein levels of RGS9·Gβ5 and enhancing the ability of RGS·Gβ5 complexes to stimulate GTPase activity of G proteins. However, notable differences exist in the subcellular targeting of alternatively configured complexes. Unlike R9AP, which relies on passive targeting mechanisms for the delivery to the outer segments of the photoreceptors, R7BP is excluded from this location and is instead specifically targeted to the plasma membrane. R7BP-containing complexes could be rerouted to the outer segments, where they are capable of regulating the phototransduction cascade by the active targeting signals derived from rhodopsin. These findings illustrate the diversity of the G-protein signaling regulation by RGS·Gβ5 complexes achieved by differential recruitment of the membrane anchors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 14%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Professor 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2010.
All research outputs
#24,782,047
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#19,077
of 23,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,489
of 154,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#189
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.