↓ Skip to main content

Quality of life of dengue patients.

Overview of attention for article published in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quality of life of dengue patients.
Published in
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, June 2008
DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.78.862
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although the disease burden of dengue is increasing, the impact on the quality of life (QoL) has not been investigated. A study to determine the QoL of confirmed dengue patients using the EuroQol visual thermometer scale was carried out at the University Malaya Medical Center. Of the 207 participants, 40% were ambulatory and 60% were hospitalized. Of eight health domains, 6.2 and 5.0 domains were affected in the hospitalized and ambulatory cohorts, respectively (P < 0.001), with cognition and interpersonal activities affected most. All patients experienced a drastic decrease in their QoL from the onset of symptoms. The QoL deteriorated to the lowest point (40% of healthy status) between the third and seventh days of illness. The duration of impaired QoL (9 days for ambulatory or 13 days for hospitalized patients) was longer than the duration of fever (5 and 7 days, respectively). Symptomatic dengue has major effects on patients' health.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
French Polynesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 16%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 30 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,093,668
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
#2,291
of 11,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,227
of 138,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
#7
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.