↓ Skip to main content

HIV rebounds from latently infected cells, rather than from continuing low-level replication

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
HIV rebounds from latently infected cells, rather than from continuing low-level replication
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2008
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0804192105
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rapid rebound of plasma viremia in patients after interruption of long-term combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) suggests persistence of low-level replicating cells or rapid reactivation of latently infected cells. To further characterize rebounding virus, we performed extensive longitudinal clonal evolutionary studies of HIV env C2-V3-C3 regions and exploited the temporal relationships of rebounding plasma viruses with regard to pretreatment sequences in 20 chronically HIV-1-infected patients having undergone multiple 2-week structured treatment interruptions (STI). Rebounding virus during the short STI was homogeneous, suggesting mono- or oligoclonal origin during reactivation. No evidence for a temporal structure of rebounding virus in regard to pretreatment sequences was found. Furthermore, expansion of distinct lineages at different STI cycles emerged. Together, these findings imply stochastic reactivation of different clones from long-lived latently infected cells rather than expansion of viral populations replicating at low levels. After treatment was stopped, diversity increased steadily, but pretreatment diversity was, on average, achieved only >2.5 years after the start of STI when marked divergence from preexisting quasispecies also emerged. In summary, our results argue against persistence of ongoing low-level replication in patients on suppressive cART. Furthermore, a prolonged delay in restoration of pretreatment viral diversity after treatment interruption demonstrates a surprisingly sustained evolutionary bottleneck induced by punctuated antiretroviral therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 4 2%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 163 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 20%
Student > Master 22 12%
Professor 15 8%
Other 10 6%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 8%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2025.
All research outputs
#3,333,734
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#35,745
of 119,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,414
of 150,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#164
of 755 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 755 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.