↓ Skip to main content

RESUSCITATION AND CRITICAL CARE OF POOR-GRADE SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE

Overview of attention for article published in Neurosurgery, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RESUSCITATION AND CRITICAL CARE OF POOR-GRADE SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE
Published in
Neurosurgery, March 2009
DOI 10.1227/01.neu.0000338946.42939.c7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

As outcomes have improved for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, most mortality and morbidity that occur today are the result of severe diffuse brain injury in poor-grade patients. The premise of this review is that aggressive emergency cardiopulmonary and neurological resuscitation, coupled with early aneurysm repair and advanced multimodality monitoring in a specialized neurocritical care unit, offers the best approach for achieving further improvements in subarachnoid hemorrhage outcomes. Emergency care should focus on control of elevated intracranial pressure, optimization of cerebral perfusion and oxygenation, and medical and surgical therapy to prevent rebleeding. In the postoperative period, advanced monitoring techniques such as continuous electroencephalography, brain tissue oxygen monitoring, and microdialysis can detect harmful secondary insults, and may eventually be used as end points for goal-directed therapy, with the aim of creating an optimal physiological environment for the comatose injured brain. As part of this paradigm shift, it is essential that aggressive surgical and medical support be linked to compassionate end-of-life care. As neurosurgeons become confident that comfort care can be implemented in a straightforward fashion after a failed trial of early maximal intervention, the usual justification for withholding treatment (survival with neurological devastation) becomes less relevant, and lives may be saved as more patients recover beyond expectations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Brazil 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 174 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 14%
Other 24 13%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Other 44 23%
Unknown 46 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 59%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 49 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,714,791
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neurosurgery
#1,531
of 5,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,541
of 108,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurosurgery
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.