↓ Skip to main content

Liraglutide Compromises Pancreatic β Cell Function in a Humanized Mouse Model

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Liraglutide Compromises Pancreatic β Cell Function in a Humanized Mouse Model
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), February 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.01.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Incretin mimetics are frequently used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes because they potentiate β cell response to glucose. Clinical evidence showing short-term benefits of such therapeutics (e.g., liraglutide) is abundant; however, there have been several recent reports of unexpected complications in association with incretin mimetic therapy. Importantly, clinical evidence on the potential effects of such agents on the β cell and islet function during long-term, multiyear use remains lacking. We now show that prolonged daily liraglutide treatment of >200 days in humanized mice, transplanted with human pancreatic islets in the anterior chamber of the eye, is associated with compromised release of human insulin and deranged overall glucose homeostasis. These findings raise concern about the chronic potentiation of β cell function through incretin mimetic therapy in diabetes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 23 25%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 23 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2025.
All research outputs
#414,075
of 34,560,573 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#429
of 3,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,041
of 457,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#7
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,560,573 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.