You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subgingival areas as potential reservoirs of different Candida spp in type 2 diabetes patients and healthy subjects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0210527 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sanja Matic Petrovic, Milena Radunovic, Milena Barac, Jovana Kuzmanovic Pficer, Dusan Pavlica, Valentina Arsic Arsenijevic, Ana Pucar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,663,380
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#157,482
of 197,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,090
of 437,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,578
of 3,211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.