↓ Skip to main content

Methods and software tools for design evaluation in population pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics studies

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Methods and software tools for design evaluation in population pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics studies
Published in
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, December 2014
DOI 10.1111/bcp.12352
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 20%
Researcher 22 19%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 31 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Computer Science 5 4%
Mathematics 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2026.
All research outputs
#7,035,724
of 32,420,622 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#1,889
of 6,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,094
of 398,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,420,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.