↓ Skip to main content

Cartilage gene expression correlates with radiographic severity of canine elbow osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Journal, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cartilage gene expression correlates with radiographic severity of canine elbow osteoarthritis
Published in
Veterinary Journal, October 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.08.027
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The relationship between radiographic measures of severity of osteoarthritis (OA) and changes in gene expression in joints are not well characterised. In this study, the expression of 11 candidate genes was characterised by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in normal and OA cartilage and bone from the elbows of dogs with fragmented coronoid disease. The levels of expression of type I collagen alpha2 chain (COL1A2), type III collagen alpha1 chain (COL3A1), lumican (LUM), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), -9 (MMP9) and -13 (MMP13) genes were increased and the expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP2) and cathepsin D (CTSD) genes were decreased in OA cartilage relative to normal cartilage. All differences correlated with radiographic measures of severity of OA. Levels of expression of COL1A2, MMP2, MMP9, MMP13 and TIMP1 were increased, whereas expression of TIMP2 was decreased in OA bone relative to normal bone. Cartilage gene expression may be correlated with the radiographic severity of OA.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Other 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2016.
All research outputs
#12,343,970
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Journal
#846
of 2,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,488
of 119,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Journal
#17
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.