↓ Skip to main content

Phosphorylation of Slx4 by Mec1 and Tel1 Regulates the Single-Strand Annealing Mode of DNA Repair in Budding Yeast

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular & Cellular Biology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Phosphorylation of Slx4 by Mec1 and Tel1 Regulates the Single-Strand Annealing Mode of DNA Repair in Budding Yeast
Published in
Molecular & Cellular Biology, March 2023
DOI 10.1128/mcb.00135-07
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Slx4 is essential for cell viability in the absence of the Sgs1 helicase and for recovery from DNA damage. Here we report that cells lacking Slx4 have difficulties in completing DNA synthesis during recovery from replisome stalling induced by the DNA alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Although DNA synthesis restarts during recovery, cells are left with unreplicated gaps in the genome despite an increase in translesion synthesis. In this light, epistasis experiments show that SLX4 interacts with genes involved in error-free bypass of DNA lesions. Slx4 associates physically, in a mutually exclusive manner, with two structure-specific endonucleases, Rad1 and Slx1, but neither of these enzymes is required for Slx4 to promote resistance to MMS. However, Rad1-dependent DNA repair by single-strand annealing (SSA) requires Slx4. Strikingly, phosphorylation of Slx4 by the Mec1 and Tel1 kinases appears to be essential for SSA but not for cell viability in the absence of Sgs1 or for cellular resistance to MMS. These results indicate that Slx4 has multiple functions in responding to DNA damage and that a subset of these are regulated by Mec1/Tel1-dependent phosphorylation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 123 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Student > Master 15 11%
Professor 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Chemistry 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2007.
All research outputs
#24,753,303
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Molecular & Cellular Biology
#13,018
of 14,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,840
of 449,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular & Cellular Biology
#9,475
of 10,453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10,453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.