↓ Skip to main content

Essential Role of DAP12 Signaling in Macrophage Programming into a Fusion-Competent State

Overview of attention for article published in Science Signaling, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Essential Role of DAP12 Signaling in Macrophage Programming into a Fusion-Competent State
Published in
Science Signaling, October 2008
DOI 10.1126/scisignal.1159665
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Multinucleated giant cells, formed by fusion of macrophages, are a hallmark of granulomatous inflammation. With a genetic approach, we show that signaling through the adaptor protein DAP12 (DNAX activating protein of 12 kD), its associated receptor triggering receptor expressed by myeloid cells 2 (TREM-2), and the downstream protein tyrosine kinase Syk is required for the cytokine-induced formation of giant cells and that overexpression of DAP12 potentiates macrophage fusion. We also present evidence that DAP12 is a general macrophage fusion regulator and is involved in modulating the expression of several macrophage-associated genes, including those encoding known mediators of macrophage fusion, such as DC-STAMP and Cadherin 1. Thus, DAP12 is involved in programming of macrophages through the regulation of gene and protein expression to induce a fusion-competent state.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 104 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 25%
Researcher 16 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#10,434,626
of 33,934,236 outputs
Outputs from Science Signaling
#2,101
of 3,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,894
of 146,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Signaling
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,934,236 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.