↓ Skip to main content

Infectious and Other Complications of Immunobiologic Agents.

Overview of attention for article published in Topics in antiviral medicine, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Infectious and Other Complications of Immunobiologic Agents.
Published in
Topics in antiviral medicine, January 2019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Chin-Hong

Abstract

Individuals with HIV infection are living longer, and are at risk of autoimmune disorders and cancers associated with aging. Many of these conditions are treated with immunobiologic agents that affect immune function and may increase risk of opportunistic infections (OIs) and other immune disorders in individuals with HIV infection. For example, tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, used to treat such disorders as Crohn's disease, are associated with risk of tuberculosis and histoplasmosis. Rituximab, used to treat lymphoma, has been associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy due to JC virus and reactivation of other viral infections. Idealisib, used to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia, has been associated with Pneumocystis pneumonia, and immune checkpoint inhibitors used to treat a variety of cancers have been associated with a wide range of immune-related adverse effects. Practitioners must maintain high vigilance for OIs and other immune-related disorders in patients with HIV infection who are receiving biologic therapies. This article summarizes a presentation by Peter Chin-Hong, MD, at the IAS-USA continuing education program held in Chicago in May 2018.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 17 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Topics in antiviral medicine
#93
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#386,392
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Topics in antiviral medicine
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.