↓ Skip to main content

The Role of the Granuloma in Expansion and Dissemination of Early Tuberculous Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
853 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Role of the Granuloma in Expansion and Dissemination of Early Tuberculous Infection
Published in
Cell, January 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Granulomas, organized aggregates of immune cells, form in response to persistent stimuli and are hallmarks of tuberculosis. Tuberculous granulomas have long been considered host-protective structures formed to contain infection. However, work in zebrafish infected with Mycobacterium marinum suggests that granulomas contribute to early bacterial growth. Here we use quantitative intravital microscopy to reveal distinct steps of granuloma formation and assess their consequence for infection. Intracellular mycobacteria use the ESX-1/RD1 virulence locus to induce recruitment of new macrophages to, and their rapid movement within, nascent granulomas. This motility enables multiple arriving macrophages to efficiently find and phagocytose infected macrophages undergoing apoptosis, leading to rapid, iterative expansion of infected macrophages and thereby bacterial numbers. The primary granuloma then seeds secondary granulomas via egress of infected macrophages. Our direct observations provide insight into how pathogenic mycobacteria exploit the granuloma during the innate immune phase for local expansion and systemic dissemination.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 853 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
China 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 824 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 170 20%
Researcher 118 14%
Student > Master 116 14%
Student > Bachelor 76 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 6%
Other 131 15%
Unknown 193 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 249 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 121 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 114 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 91 11%
Chemistry 19 2%
Other 51 6%
Unknown 208 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2026.
All research outputs
#1,565,577
of 29,326,800 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#5,206
of 18,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,833
of 207,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#15
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,326,800 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.