↓ Skip to main content

The prevalence and phenomenology of self‐injurious and aggressive behaviour in genetic syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The prevalence and phenomenology of self‐injurious and aggressive behaviour in genetic syndromes
Published in
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, October 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01337.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Self-injurious and aggressive behaviours are reported as components of some behavioural phenotypes but there are few studies comparing across syndrome groups. In this study we examined the prevalence of these behaviours and the associated person characteristics in seven genetic syndromes. Questionnaire data on self-injury and aggression, mood, hyperactivity, autism spectrum disorder and repetitive behaviour were collected on Angelman (AS, n=104), Cornelia de Lange (CdLS, 101), Cri du Chat (CdCS, 58), Fragile X (FXS, 191), Lowe (LS, 56), Prader-Willi (PWS, 189) and Smith-Magenis (SMS, 42) syndromes. A significantly higher prevalence of self-injury was evident in CdCS, CdLS, FXS, PWS, LS and SMS. The prevalence of aggression was significantly heightened in AS and SMS. Self-injury was associated with repetitive and impulsive behaviour in CdLS, FXS, PWS and LS. Impulsivity and overactivity were significantly higher in those showing aggression across all syndrome groups. These data quantify the risk for self-injury and aggression in the syndromes studied with implications for early intervention. The associations between these behaviours and person characteristics both within and between syndromes warrant further research.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 237 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 10%
Researcher 25 10%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 69 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 12%
Social Sciences 22 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 71 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#13,907,619
of 24,776,799 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#888
of 1,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,227
of 104,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,776,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.