↓ Skip to main content

ATG12 Conjugation to ATG3 Regulates Mitochondrial Homeostasis and Cell Death

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ATG12 Conjugation to ATG3 Regulates Mitochondrial Homeostasis and Cell Death
Published in
Cell, August 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.018
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

ATG12, an ubiquitin-like modifier required for macroautophagy, has a single known conjugation target, another autophagy regulator called ATG5. Here, we identify ATG3 as a substrate for ATG12 conjugation. ATG3 is the E2-like enzyme necessary for ATG8/LC3 lipidation during autophagy. ATG12-ATG3 complex formation requires ATG7 as the E1 enzyme and ATG3 autocatalytic activity as the E2, resulting in the covalent linkage of ATG12 onto a single lysine on ATG3. Surprisingly, disrupting ATG12 conjugation to ATG3 does not affect starvation-induced autophagy. Rather, the lack of ATG12-ATG3 complex formation produces an expansion in mitochondrial mass and inhibits cell death mediated by mitochondrial pathways. Overall, these results unveil a role for ATG12-ATG3 in mitochondrial homeostasis and implicate the ATG12 conjugation system in cellular functions distinct from the early steps of autophagosome formation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 5 2%
France 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Trinidad and Tobago 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 266 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 22%
Researcher 62 22%
Student > Master 31 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 7%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 47 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 124 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 1%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 51 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,629,744
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#10,021
of 19,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,392
of 150,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#40
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.