↓ Skip to main content

Inositol polyphosphate multikinase is a physiologic PI3-kinase that activates Akt/PKB

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inositol polyphosphate multikinase is a physiologic PI3-kinase that activates Akt/PKB
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2011
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1017831108
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The second messenger phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP(3)), formed by the p110 family of PI3-kinases, promotes cellular growth, proliferation, and survival, in large part by activating the protein kinase Akt/PKB. We show that inositol polyphosphate multikinase (IPMK) physiologically generates PIP(3) as well as water soluble inositol phosphates. IPMK deletion reduces growth factor-elicited Akt signaling and cell proliferation caused uniquely by loss of its PI3-kinase activity. Inhibition of p110 PI3-kinases by wortmannin prevents IPMK phosphorylation and activation. Thus, growth factor stimulation of Akt signaling involves PIP(3) generation through the sequential activations of the p110 PI3-kinases and IPMK. As inositol phosphates inhibit Akt signaling, IPMK appears to act as a molecular switch, inhibiting or stimulating Akt via its inositol phosphate kinase or PI3-kinase activities, respectively. Drugs regulating IPMK may have therapeutic relevance in influencing cell proliferation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 99 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 30%
Researcher 19 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Chemistry 7 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 19 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#10,721,406
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#78,805
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,393
of 254,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#495
of 760 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 760 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.