↓ Skip to main content

Brucella melitensis 16M: characterisation of the galE gene and mouse immunisation studies with a galE deficient mutant

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Microbiology, February 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Brucella melitensis 16M: characterisation of the galE gene and mouse immunisation studies with a galE deficient mutant
Published in
Veterinary Microbiology, February 1999
DOI 10.1016/s0378-1135(98)00281-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The galE gene of Streptomyces lividans was used to probe a cosmid library harbouring Brucella melitensis 16M DNA and the nucleotide sequence of a 2.5 kb ClaI fragment which hybridised was determined. An open reading frame encoding a predicted polypeptide with significant homology to UDP-galactose-4-epimerases of Brucella arbortus strain 2308 and other bacterial species was identified. DNA sequences flanking the B. melitensis galE gene shared no identity with other gal genes and, as for B. abortus, were located adjacent to a mazG homologue. A plasmid which encoded the B. melitensis galE open reading frame complemented a galE mutation in Salmonella typhimurium LB5010, as shown by the restoration of smooth lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis, sensitivity to phage P22 infection and restoration of UDP-galactose-4-epimerase activity. The galE gene on the B. melitensis 16M chromosome was disrupted by insertional inactivation and these mutants lacked UDP-galactose-4-epimerase activity but no discernible differences in LPS structure between parent and the mutants were observed. One B. melitensis 16M galE mutant, Bm92, was assessed for virulence in CD-1 and BALB/c mice and displayed similar kinetics of invasion and persistence in tissues compared with the parent bacterial strain. CD-1 mice immunised with B. melitensis 16M galE were protected against B. melitensis 16M challenge.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Malaysia 1 5%
Spain 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Other 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 29%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2011.
All research outputs
#9,515,460
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Microbiology
#1,085
of 4,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,698
of 109,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Microbiology
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.