↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Review of General Thoracic Surgery Articles to Identify Predictors of Operating Room Case Durations

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systematic Review of General Thoracic Surgery Articles to Identify Predictors of Operating Room Case Durations
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2008
DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e318164f0d5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous studies of operating room (OR) information systems data over the past two decades have shown how to predict case durations using the combination of scheduled procedure(s), individual surgeon and assistant(s), and type of anesthetic(s). We hypothesized that the accuracy of case duration prediction could be improved by the use of other electronic medical record data (e.g., patient weight or surgeon notes using standardized vocabularies).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 32%
Engineering 11 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 10%
Computer Science 8 9%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2008.
All research outputs
#24,756,754
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#8,829
of 10,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,225
of 137,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#56
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.