↓ Skip to main content

Common variants in LSP1, 2q35 and 8q24 and breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Overview of attention for article published in Human Molecular Genetics, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Common variants in LSP1, 2q35 and 8q24 and breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
Published in
Human Molecular Genetics, August 2009
DOI 10.1093/hmg/ddp372
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonis C. Antoniou, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Lesley McGuffog, Sue Healey, Heli Nevanlinna, Tuomas Heikkinen, Jacques Simard, Amanda B. Spurdle, Jonathan Beesley, Xiaoqing Chen, The Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer, Susan L. Neuhausen, Yuan C. Ding, Fergus J. Couch, Xianshu Wang, Zachary Fredericksen, Paolo Peterlongo, Bernard Peissel, Bernardo Bonanni, Alessandra Viel, Loris Bernard, Paolo Radice, Csilla I. Szabo, Lenka Foretova, Michal Zikan, Kathleen Claes, Mark H. Greene, Phuong L., Gad Rennert, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Irene L. Andrulis, Hilmi Ozcelik, Gord Glendon, OCGN, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Mads Thomassen, Lone Sunde, Maria A. Caligo, Yael Laitman, Tair Kontorovich, Shimrit Cohen, Bella Kaufman, Efrat Dagan, Ruth Gershoni Baruch, Eitan Friedman, Katja Harbst, Gisela Barbany-Bustinza, Johanna Rantala, Hans Ehrencrona, Per Karlsson, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Ana Osorio, Ignacio Blanco, Adriana Lasa, Javier Benítez, Ute Hamann, Frans B.L. Hogervorst, Matti A. Rookus, J. Margriet Collee, Peter Devilee, Marjolijn J. Ligtenberg, Rob B. van der Luijt, Cora M. Aalfs, Quinten Waisfisz, Juul Wijnen, Cornelis E.P. van Roozendaal, HEBON, Susan Peock, Margaret Cook, Debra Frost, Clare Oliver, Radka Platte, D. Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo, Rosalind Eeles, Louise Izatt, Rosemarie Davidson, Carol Chu, Diana Eccles, Trevor Cole, Shirley Hodgson, EMBRACE, Andrew K. Godwin, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Bruno Buecher, Mélanie Léoné, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets, Audrey Remenieras, Olivier Caron, Gilbert M. Lenoir, Nicolas Sevenet, Michel Longy, Sandra Fert Ferrer, Fabienne Prieur, GEMO, David Goldgar, Alexander Miron, Esther M. John, Saundra S. Buys, Mary B. Daly, John L. Hopper, Mary Beth Terry, Yosuf Yassin, Christian Singer Breast Cancer Family Registry, Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich, Christine Staudigl, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Rosa Bjork Barkardottir, Tomas Kirchhoff, Prodipto Pal, Kristi Kosarin, Kenneth Offit, Marion Piedmonte, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Katie Wakeley, John F. Boggess, Jack Basil, Peter E. Schwartz, Stephanie V. Blank, Amanda E. Toland, Marco Montagna, Cinzia Casella, Evgeny N. Imyanitov, Anna Allavena, Rita K. Schmutzler, Beatrix Versmold, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Nina Ditsch, Norbert Arnold, Dieter Niederacher, Helmut Deißler, Britta Fiebig, Christian Suttner, Ines Schönbuchner, Dorothea Gadzicki, Trinidad Caldes, Miguel de la Hoya, Karen A. Pooley, Douglas F. Easton, Georgia Chenevix-Trench

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 104 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 13%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Mathematics 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 29 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,728,253
of 34,054,827 outputs
Outputs from Human Molecular Genetics
#1,183
of 9,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,909
of 172,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Molecular Genetics
#7
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.