↓ Skip to main content

The pathways of interoceptive awareness

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
516 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The pathways of interoceptive awareness
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, November 2009
DOI 10.1038/nn.2411
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A network of cortical brain regions, including the insula and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), has been proposed as the critical and sole substrate for interoceptive awareness. Combining lesion and pharmacological approaches in humans, we found that the insula and ACC were not critical for awareness of heartbeat sensations. Instead, this awareness was mediated by both somatosensory afferents from the skin and a network that included the insula and ACC. Together, these pathways enable the core human experience of the cardiovascular state of the body.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 516 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 487 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 113 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 19%
Student > Master 56 11%
Student > Bachelor 40 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 6%
Other 82 16%
Unknown 94 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 162 31%
Neuroscience 85 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 9%
Sports and Recreations 8 2%
Other 42 8%
Unknown 123 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,248,163
of 27,688,977 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#2,595
of 5,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,486
of 117,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#8
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,688,977 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.