↓ Skip to main content

Processing of the Matricellular Protein Hevin in Mouse Brain Is Dependent on ADAMTS4*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Processing of the Matricellular Protein Hevin in Mouse Brain Is Dependent on ADAMTS4*
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, December 2009
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m109.070318
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The matricellular SPARC family member hevin (SPARC-like 1/SPARCL-1/SC1/Mast9) contributes to neural development and alters tumor progression in a range of mammalian models. The distribution of hevin in mouse tissues was reexamined with a novel monoclonal antibody that discriminates between hevin and its ortholog SPARC. We now report proteolysis of hevin in many tissues, with the most extensive processing in the brain. We demonstrate a cleavage site within the hevin sequence for the neural tissue proteinase ADAMTS4. Digestion of hevin by ADAMTS4 in vitro produced fragments similar to those present in brain lysates. Monoclonal antibodies revealed a SPARC-like fragment generated from hevin that was co-localized with ADAMTS4 in vivo. We show that proteolysis of hevin by ADAMTS4 in the mouse cerebellum is important for the normal development of this tissue. In conclusion, we have identified the fragmentation of hevin by ADAMTS4 in the mouse brain and propose that this specific proteolysis is integral to cell morphology and extracellular matrix deposition in the developing brain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 24%
Neuroscience 10 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Design 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2012.
All research outputs
#9,642,007
of 31,591,940 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#10,156
of 28,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,011
of 215,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#209
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,591,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.