↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge‐based protein modelling and design

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Biochemistry, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
119 patents

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Knowledge‐based protein modelling and design
Published in
European Journal of Biochemistry, March 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13917.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A systematic technique for protein modelling that is applicable to the design of drugs, peptide vaccines and novel proteins is described. Our approach is knowledge-based, depending on the structures of homologous or analogous proteins and more generally on a relational data base of protein three-dimensional structures. The procedure simultaneously aligns the known tertiary structures, selects fragments from the structurally conserved regions on the basis of sequence homology, aligns these with the 'average structure' or 'framework', builds on the loops selected from homologous proteins or a wider database, substitutes sidechains and energy minimises the resultant model. Applications to modelling an homologous structure, tissue plasminogen activator on the basis of another serine proteinase, and to modelling an analogous protein, HIV viral proteinase on the basis of aspartic proteinases, are described. The converse problem of ab initio design is also addressed: this involves the selection of an amino acid sequence to give a particular tertiary structure, in this case a symmetrical domain of two Greek-key motifs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Computer Science 6 8%
Chemistry 4 6%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2026.
All research outputs
#3,737,512
of 34,115,020 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Biochemistry
#261
of 8,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,900
of 106,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Biochemistry
#106
of 4,560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,115,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.