↓ Skip to main content

Surface relaxation and chemical exchange in hydrating cement pastes: A two-dimensional NMR relaxation study

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Surface relaxation and chemical exchange in hydrating cement pastes: A two-dimensional NMR relaxation study
Published in
Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, July 2005
DOI 10.1103/physreve.72.011409
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We report the first nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) two-dimensional correlation T(1) - T(2) and T(2) - T(2) measurements of hydrating cement pastes. A small but distinct cross peak in the two-dimensional relaxation spectrum provides the first direct evidence of chemical exchange of water between gel and capillary pores occurring over the first 14 days of hydration. A correlation of features along the line T(1) = 4T(2) provides strong supportive evidence for the surface diffusion model of (1)H nuclear spin relaxation in cements and for a multimodal discrete pore size distribution. Differences in detail of the results are reported for white cement paste and white cement paste with added silica fume. Both the method and the theory presented can be applied more widely to other high surface area materials with other reactive surface areas.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 234 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 28%
Researcher 43 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 9%
Student > Master 14 6%
Other 9 4%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 45 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 52 22%
Chemistry 36 15%
Materials Science 34 14%
Physics and Astronomy 33 14%
Chemical Engineering 13 5%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 57 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#12,357,273
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
#4,614
of 24,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,856
of 99,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
#20
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.