↓ Skip to main content

Bilateral Effects of 6 Weeks' Unilateral Acupuncture and Electroacupuncture on Ankle Dorsiflexors Muscle Strength: A Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bilateral Effects of 6 Weeks' Unilateral Acupuncture and Electroacupuncture on Ankle Dorsiflexors Muscle Strength: A Pilot Study
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, November 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine the effect of unilateral manual acupuncture at selected acupoints on ankle dorsiflexion strength of both limbs, and compare the effect with that of electroacupuncture at the same acupoints and sham points.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Other 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Sports and Recreations 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2015.
All research outputs
#24,363,758
of 33,942,205 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#6,363
of 7,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,754
of 192,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#39
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,942,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.