↓ Skip to main content

Are we there yet? Bevacizumab therapy for retinopathy of prematurity

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Are we there yet? Bevacizumab therapy for retinopathy of prematurity
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, December 2011
DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 86 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 19%
Other 11 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 64%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2016.
All research outputs
#9,469,675
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#1,219
of 2,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,024
of 304,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.