↓ Skip to main content

Design Principles for Broad-Spectrum Protein-Crystal Nucleants with Nanoscale Pits

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Design Principles for Broad-Spectrum Protein-Crystal Nucleants with Nanoscale Pits
Published in
Physical Review Letters, November 2010
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.105.205501
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Growing high-quality crystals is a bottleneck in the determination of protein structures by x-ray diffraction. Experiments find that materials with a disordered pitted surface seed the growth of protein crystals. Here we report computer simulations of rapid crystal nucleation in nanoscale pits. Nucleation is rapid, as the crystal forms in pits that have filled with liquid via capillary condensation. Surprisingly, we find that pits whose surfaces are rough are better than pits with crystalline surfaces; the roughness prevents the growing crystal from trying to conform to the pit surface and becoming strained.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Professor 9 16%
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 9 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 17 29%
Physics and Astronomy 12 21%
Materials Science 7 12%
Engineering 4 7%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#12,064,104
of 33,937,515 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#23,376
of 50,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,138
of 153,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#144
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,937,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.