↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Sleep Deprivation on Serum Influenza-Specific IgG

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
reddit
1 Redditor
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of Sleep Deprivation on Serum Influenza-Specific IgG
Published in
Sleep, January 1998
DOI 10.1093/sleep/21.1.19
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Intra-pulmonary protection against influenza virus in immune mice, largely dependent upon serum lgG, is reported to be suppressed by 7 hours of sleep deprivation following viral challenge. This implies that sleep deprivation may accelerate the catabolism of influenza-specific antibodies. To determine the effects of sleep deprivation on the catabolism of serum antibodies, BALB/c mice were passively immunized intravenously with lgG anti-influenza monoclonalantibodies and catabolism kinetics monitored for 6 days. Mice were then sleep-deprived for either 9 hours (one episode) or for 9 hours followed by 6 hours on the consecutive day (two episodes) and the serum titer of influenza-specific monoclonal antibodies monitored for an additional 8 days via ELISA. One episode of sleep-deprivation had only minor effects on lgG catabolism; however, two episodes of sleep-deprivation caused significant changes in the kinetics of lgG catabolism, resulting in elevated lgG levels (p = 0.02) for 2 days post-sleep deprivation. Elevation of serum influenza-specific lgG (p = 0.005) was also seen in actively immune mice following two episodes of sleep-deprivation. Serum chemistries ruled out dehydration as a cause of the increased antibody levels; however, some anomalies were noted: total protein and albumin were elevated, although not significantly, and P and Ca were decreased. Thus, our data do not support the hypothesis that sleep-deprivation lowers existing serum antibody titers by accelerating antibody catabolism.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 5%
China 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 29%
Professor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 29%
Psychology 4 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2025.
All research outputs
#4,631,380
of 31,724,768 outputs
Outputs from Sleep
#2,063
of 5,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,157
of 125,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,724,768 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.