↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Has a Direct Effect on Glucose and Protein Metabolism, But No Effect on Lipid Metabolism in Type 1 Diabetes
Published in
JCEM, January 2004
DOI 10.1210/jc.2003-031274
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is evidence of a metabolic role for IGF-I in type 1 diabetes, but it is unclear whether IGF-I acts indirectly by reducing GH secretion or has direct effects. Using stable isotopes we have investigated, on three separate occasions, the effect of a pulse of recombinant human GH, a sc injection of recombinant human IGF-I, and a placebo on glucose, lipid, and protein metabolism in subjects with type 1 diabetes during a basal insulin infusion and a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. Endogenous GH secretion was suppressed with octreotide. IGF-I reduced the hepatic glucose production rate (Ra), increased peripheral glucose uptake, and reduced protein breakdown during the basal insulin infusion (P < 0.05, P < 0.005, and P < 0.05, respectively, vs. placebo) and the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (P < 0.05, P < 0.005, and P < 0.05, respectively, vs. placebo). IGF-I had no effect on glycerol Ra, an index of lipolysis. GH increased glucose and glycerol Ra during the basal insulin infusion (P < 0.005 vs. placebo study), but the effects were no different from placebo during the clamp. In conclusion, IGF-I had a direct effect on glucose and protein metabolism, which was maintained during the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. This suggests that IGF-I acts in concert with insulin and may have an important role in maintaining glucose homeostasis and protein metabolism in type 1 diabetes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2014.
All research outputs
#12,345,312
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#11,028
of 20,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,034
of 199,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#85
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.